Concerns are mounting over a potential staffing crisis in the UK’s elderly care sector, as government proposals to tighten migration rules risk deterring overseas workers who make up a significant portion of the workforce.
Under the plans, migrant care workers would have to wait 15 years—up from the current five—before qualifying for permanent residency, or indefinite leave to remain. The sector, already under strain, relies heavily on foreign labour, with around one in three care home staff coming from abroad.
At one care home in southeastern England, nearly two-thirds of employees were born overseas, reflecting a broader national trend. Industry leaders warn that extending the settlement period could drive workers to seek opportunities in countries with more accessible immigration pathways.
Kuldeep Singh, an Indian national and deputy manager at Applegarth Care Home, said the proposed changes could significantly alter his future plans. Originally expecting to qualify for permanent residency in 2028, he now faces the prospect of waiting until 2038.
“If I can move to countries like Canada or Australia and gain permanent status within a few years, why would I wait 15?” he said, adding that he has already postponed buying a home in the UK.
The government says the policy is aimed at addressing public concerns over migration levels and reducing long-term pressure on public finances, as settled migrants become eligible for benefits such as pensions.
However, critics argue the move could worsen existing workforce shortages. Vacancy rates in the care sector are already nearly three times the national average, placing additional strain on hospitals when patients cannot be discharged due to lack of care home capacity.
Jonathan Portes, an economist at King’s College London, described the proposal as a “major mistake” that could undermine the UK’s economic interests.
“This would leave the UK out of step with other countries and make it a far less attractive destination for workers,” he said.
Portes also challenged government estimates that granting permanent residency to care workers would cost billions in public spending, arguing instead that migrant workers make a significant net contribution to public finances before drawing pensions.
The Home Office did not respond to requests for comment.
Source: Reuters
